surroundings. She believes this has been taken out of context. While this proposed building matches Sugar Camp, she asked that everyone remember that Sugar Camp was only purchased 10 years ago. The residents of Hatcher Hills look south to the rest of Oakwood and this is what she believes needs to be in the Sugar Camp space. New businesses are welcomed, including Russell Wealth Management, but Sugar Camp has morphed from houses to duplexes to apartments, etc. Hatcher Hills is much closer to this proposed building than Pointe Oakwood. It is not about size or elevation, it is about the façade of the building. The architecture is not related to Hatcher Hills or Pointe Oakwood; it is related to Sugar Camp. Mrs. Cerny shared concern as to why with only 20 employees, 22,000 square feet is needed. This would not maximize income tax revenue or property taxes. She would welcome Russell Wealth Management if they were on the appropriate sized land and if the building preserved the architectural integrity of Oakwood.

Mr. Stefan Susta, 20 W. Schantz Avenue, stated that he was part of the previous opposition to condos at Pointe Oakwood. He lives in Hatcher Hills and he does not have any objections to this application. He shared that the architecture and landscaping efforts by the applicant have been fabulous and he is satisfied that the proposed building will add value to Oakwood.

Ms. April Jordan, representing Oakwood Investment Group (OIG), approached Council and shared that she is attending to express support of the application from OIG. She added that there will not be a better fit under the Settlement Agreement.

Mrs. Sarah Waechter, 231 Northview Road, thanked the city for providing information and for being so transparent. She shared that she believes the building will compliment Oakwood and it will be a good fit. She appreciates the efforts as it relates to the proposed landscaping. One of her main concerns was the traffic in the area, but with a minimal number of employees, she does not feel this will be an issue.

Mr. Irvin Harlamert, 330 Southview Road, shared that he walks and drives on W. Schantz almost every day, and he would have to look at the proposed building the rest of his life. He urged City Council to carefully consider the application being presented this evening. He believes the architectural design is even more offensive than the existing three Sugar Camp office buildings and the synagogue. He then posed two questions: 1.) Why can’t the parking lot be on the other side of the building; and, 2.) Why can’t we get an architectural design that is a blend between the commercial buildings to the west and the residential neighborhoods. He shared that when he spoke to Russell Wealth Management representatives, they impressed upon him that they like this location because of the exposure that it gives them. He referenced a photo that he left on the dais for City Council and city staff, and explained that the proposed building is located one block from Far Hills Avenue and does not have much exposure. He suggests they move the proposed building to the 1.5 acre lot at the corner of Far Hills Avenue and Old River Trail to accommodate their need for exposure. He then provided an overview of an alternative proposal. He suggested that the alternative proposal would be compatible with the residential buildings to the east and south with a classic residential design. The building would be one to two stories in height, and would include underground parking. Mr. Harlamert also referenced a letter he placed on the dais for City Council and city staff from Irvin and Tracey Bieser. Mr. Harlamert asked that the requested application be tabled, and asked City Council to consider setting up a meeting with a group from Hatcher Hills, Russell Wealth Management and city staff for an informal discussion.

Ms. April Jordan, shared that the 1.5 acre parcel that Mr. Harlamert suggested is owned by Randall Residence and it is not for sale.

Mr. Matt Arnovitz, stated that the development team has tried to encourage neighbor discussions, but when they held a neighbor meeting, Mr. Harlamert was the only person who attended the meeting. He added that they would like to get started on the development as soon as possible.

Mr. Irvin Harlamert shared that he attended the neighbor meeting, but he didn’t get an invitation. He added that he did not give Russell Wealth Management the impression that he was for or against the proposal.

Mr. Charles Cerny, 201 Maysfield Road, reminded the group that in the last ten years there have been other developments and improvements that are compatible with the area, such as the Oakwood City Building and the schools. Citizens of Oakwood want to have a similar transitional capability and transitional view with this proposed building as well.

Mr. Brian Morris, 325 Maysfield Road, shared that he feels good about some of the things in the proposed application, such as the landscaping, but he joins the Hatcher Plat petition against the application.