arXiv:2601.21343v1 [cs.CL] 29 Jan 2026

Self-Improving Pretraining:
using post-trained models to pretrain better models

Ellen Xiaoqing Tan, Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Jing Xu, Ping Yu, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, Olga Golovneva

FAIR at Meta

Ensuring safety, factuality and overall quality in the generations of large language models is a critical challenge, especially as these models are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. The prevailing approach to addressing these issues involves collecting expensive, carefully curated datasets and applying multiple stages of fine-tuning and alignment. However, even this complex pipeline cannot guarantee the correction of patterns learned during pretraining. Therefore, addressing these issues during pretraining is crucial, as it shapes a model’s core behaviors and prevents unsafe or hallucinated outputs from becoming deeply embedded. To tackle this issue, we introduce a new pretraining method that streams documents and uses reinforcement learning (RL) to improve the next K generated tokens at each step. A strong, post-trained model judges candidate generations—including model rollouts, the original suffix, and a rewritten suffix—for quality, safety, and factuality. Early in training, the process relies on the original and rewritten suffixes; as the model improves, RL rewards high-quality rollouts. This approach builds higher quality, safer, and more factual models from the ground up. In experiments, our method gives 36.2% and 18.5% relative improvements over standard pretraining in terms of factuality and safety, and up to 86.3% win rate improvements in overall generation quality.

Self-Improving pretraining diagram
Figure 1 Self-Improving pretraining: Our proposed model training streams pretraining documents and improves the next K generated tokens (suffix, given prefix) at each step with RL. A strong previously post-trained model is used to judge generation candidates at each RL step for quality, safety and hallucination, where the candidates are: (i) N rollouts from the current policy; (ii) the original suffix; and (iii) a rewrite of the suffix by the strong post-trained model. The rewrite can improve the pretrain data’s quality or safety; in the latter case as the prefix remains unsafe the model is always learning how to steer away to a safe suffix. At the start of training model rollouts (i) are low quality, so training relies on candidates (ii) and (iii); later in training the judge starts rewarding winning rollouts.
1