Mr. Jacques replied that the city is not aware of any scheduled Board of Zoning Appeals meetings at this time.
The adopted staff findings of fact are as follows:
VARIANCE FACTORS
The property can yield a reasonable return with or without the variance.
Staff considers this to be a minor variance, adjusting the existing setback of 25 feet to 22 feet. Although this variance would place the home a little closer to the front lot line, the setback would remain consistent with the character of other homes in the neighborhood.
Staff believes the essential character of the neighborhood, which is primarily single family residential, would not be adversely affected by this variance. The front porch will be designed and constructed to complement the existing home and neighborhood. The purpose of the addition is to create additional outdoor space for the Applicant and does not change the use of the property. The proposed setback has existing precedent in the neighborhood already. There are homes in the neighborhood with porches who have current setbacks less than the required 25 feet, ranging from 17-24 feet.
There is no reason to believe governmental services would be adversely affected due to the granting of the variance. (See attached comment forms.)
Staff has no information as to the owner’s knowledge at the time of purchase.
Due to the size and existing layout of the lot, the Applicant cannot construct a porch without a front yard setback variance. As noted, the Applicant has designed their project carefully to minimize the need for additional variances.