Mr. Aidt mentioned the noise level while walking near Orchardly Park. He also mentioned the possibility of noise-reducing paddles.

Mrs. Gowdy stated that noise is not her primary concern, though she is not opposed to exploring noise mitigation options. Her main concern relates to the proposed hours of operation.

Mr. Finley agreed that hours of operation are a concern. He stated that allowing play until 8:00 p.m. seems excessive, particularly if individuals are scheduling court time primarily for recreational use. While office hours may extend that late, he does not believe pickleball activity needs to. He also wondered if residents living near existing courts have had any complaints regarding the noise. However, he noted that stormwater does not appear to be a concern based on the submitted report, and that the proposed court is located farther from residences than other existing courts.

Mrs. Gowdy pointed out that courts located in public parks are expected by nearby homeowners, whereas courts placed within or near residential areas may not be anticipated. She added that the most active hours would likely be between 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.

Mr. Aidt acknowledged the need for additional parking. He noted that the applicant does not currently occupy the entire building, which could require even more parking in the future. He also stated that drainage appears capable of handling expansion. Mr. Lauterbach agreed that additional parking is reasonable. While some spaces may go unused during normal operations, they would be beneficial during events and are not excessive. Mr. Finley stated that he is generally not in favor of expanding parking areas but is convinced there is a need in this case. He added that any drainage issues should be addressed if they arise.

Mrs. Gowdy asked whether a noise study should be required and consider modifying the proposed hours of operation. Mr. Lauterbach stated that if a study demonstrates noise is not a concern, then hours of operation may become less significant.

Mr. Aidt asked whether such a study could be requested. Mr. Jacques replied that the commission can ask the applicant if they are willing to conduct a noise study. If not, the commission would need to make a decision based on the current application. Mr. Aidt suggested that a sound study could be conducted similar to the previously completed lighting study.

Mr. Aidt asked the applicant if they were willing to complete a noise study.

Jerad Barnett, the Applicant, expressed appreciation for the residents’ concerns. He stated that he reviewed other courts within the area and found no recorded complaints. He emphasized that pickleball is part of the business model and is in demand by clients. He noted that the proposed hours align with local noise ordinances but expressed willingness to adjust them if necessary. He also agreed to complete a noise study and consider alternative paddles to reduce noise.

Mrs. Gowdy suggested modifications to the application to include the use of noise-dampening paddles and more restrictive hours of operation. Mr. Aidt proposed limiting hours to 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

It was then moved by Mrs. Gowdy and seconded by Mr. Lauterbach to recommend Council approval of Application #26-2 to adopt the staff recommendations, with amended hours and conditions, for the amendment of the current Sugar Camp/ Pointe Oakwood Master Plan for the