lea

search cannot be ascertained. The Court now finds that proper notice by publication has been given to all of said Defendants.

Come now the Plaintiff and files herein the Clerk's proof of mailing of notice by registered mail to those Defendants whose addresses are unknown together with the proof of delivery showing said certified mail has in fact been delivered to the Defendants.

By reason of the publication as herein above described, and the service by certified mail, the Court now finds that proper service has been made upon each and all of the following Defendants, to-wit:

GEORGE W. COFFIN or his heirs and assigns, MICHELE GLAZE, BOBBIE L. GALBRAITH, MILDRED E. GALBRAITH,

AND THE UNKNOWN HUSBAND, WIFE, WIDOW, WIDOWER, CHILD, CHILDREN, DESCENDANTS, HEIRS, SURVIVING SPOUSES, CREDITORS AND ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE; DEVISEES, LEGATEES, TRUSTEES, EXECUTORS OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENTS; SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST AND ASSIGNS, RESPECTFULLY, OF EACH OF THE FOREGOING PERSONS, ALL OF WHOM ARE UNKNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFFS;

ALL OF THE WOMEN ONCE KNOWN BY ANY OF THE NAMES AND DESIGNATIONS ABOVE STATED WHOSE NAMES MAY HAVE BEEN CHANGED AND WHO ARE NOW KNOWN BY OTHER NAMES; THE NAMES OF ALL WHOM ARE UNKNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF, AS THE SPOUSES OF EACH OF THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE, OR DESCRIBED AND DESIGNATED AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION WHO ARE MARRIED; THE NAMES OF ALL OF WHOM ARE UNKNOWN TO PLAINTIFF; DEFENDANTS.

Now, upon motion of the Plaintiff, each and all of the Defendants in this cause are three (3) times audibly called in open Court but come not and herein wholly make default.

The Plaintiff having previously filed the Affidavit of Non-Military Status showing that the Plaintiff have no knowledge as to whether or not any of said Defendants are in the armed forces of the United States or any of it's allies.

This cause is now submitted to the Court for trial and judgment and decree without the intervention of a jury and the Court having heard the evidence and being sufficiently advised in the premises now finds as follows:

1.
That this Court has jurisdiction of the real estate as described in the complaint herein and has jurisdiction over each and all of the Defendants to said complaint with respect to said real estate.
2.
That none of the individual Defendants named in this action are in the military service. That it cannot be determined whether or not the individual Defendants whose names are unknown are in the military service. The such unknown Defendants have no material interest in the real estate sought to be