Capital Improvements Program
The City of Oakwood should continue with its annual Capital Improvements Program. The Capital Improvements Program lists public projects to be undertaken over the next five-year period and estimates the budget for each project. Funding for the program is derived from City funds as well as state and federal funds. The Capital Improvements Program anticipates, identifies and prioritizes projects so that they can be incorporated into the City’s operating budget.
The Capital Improvement Program is reviewed and adjusted on a yearly basis. It is recommended that this program be continued and expanded as funding and city resources will allow.
Prepare an Implementation Action Agenda
The City should prepare an implementation “action agenda” which highlights the improvement and development projects and activities to be undertaken during the next few years. The “action agenda” should consist of:
In order to remain current, the “action agenda” should be updated once a year. The City should consider retaining the Comprehensive Plan Committee to assist with developing the “action agenda” and to review progress made each year in addressing the goals and objectives outlined in the Plan.
Explore Funding Sources and Implementation Techniques
While many of the projects and improvements called for in the Comprehensive Plan can be implemented through administrative and policy decisions or can be funded through normal municipal programs, other projects may require special technical and/or financial assistance.
The City should continue to explore and consider the wide range of local, state and federal resources and programs that may be available to assist in the implementation of planning recommendations. For example, Tax Increment Financing may be a tool to explore for the mixed-use redevelopment of the Sugar Camp property
Enhance Public Communication
The City should make this summary version of the new Comprehensive Plan available throughout the community. It is important that all local residents, businesses and property owners be familiar with the Plan’s major recommendations and its “vision” for the future.
The City should also consider additional techniques for responding quickly to public questions and concerns regarding planning and development. For example, the City might consider spe-