Mr. Murphy clarified that many times in a recorded transaction it may say it was for $1 and it is not which may be the confusion.

Mr. Uitermarkt stated that the goal was to build a pole barn to store the ambulances and materials for jobs to be inside. He stated that they would have a delivery once per month and needed enough space for that storage and to keep the diesel trucks inside. He stated that they had the fire reports from where they burned the trailer and they came to put it out. He stated that the house across the street had been sold to Titan Properties through a land contract so he no longer owned it.

Mr. Brand asked if he had intention to put up billboards.

Mr. Uitermarkt stated not at this time. He stated it would help his business but if it was going to keep him from being allowed to build, then no.

Mr. Brand asked if the property was rezoned, would they be allowed to have a sign for Mr. Bath.

Ms. Swackhamer stated yes, if they followed the sign ordinance. She stated that signs and billboards were regulated separately.

Mr. Carroll asked for clarification that a business sign would be different than a billboard.

Ms. Swackhamer stated yes.

Mr. Smith stated that the application mentioned 2 billboards which was why they had questions.

Mr. Uitermarkt asked if the difference between a sign and a billboard was the height.

Ms. Swackhamer stated that business signage would be on your property and advertising business activity on that property. She stated that a billboard was considered an off-premise sign and would normally be owned or leased by a company advertising businesses not located on that same property. She stated that a sign on your property advertising your business would be an on-premise sign and would be either a ground/monument sign or a wall sign.

Mr. Brand asked if Ms. Uitermarkt intended to have a sign advertising his business.

Mr. Uitermarkt stated yes.

Mr. Brand asked if he owned the property that had been remodeled.