Speaker-ASo we will hold a vote on all of these unless we find out that something's substantially different. We will hold that after you present on each one of those.

Speaker-DOkay, so is there an order you want me to go in?

Speaker-AYes, let Let's please start with the Nine Mile Data Center, 042726.

Speaker-DStart with the data center and then which ones sequentially after that?

nine mile

Speaker-BCan we please have the people be quiet? I can't hear even what she's asking.

Speaker-DSorry, I'm kind of a low speaker. I'll do better. Sorry.

So we'll begin with the data center and then-.

Speaker-AThen next we'll go to the Wells Drive MLC Natural Gas Power Plant. Yes. Okay. And then we move to the Solar Power Plant.

Okay. And then finally the water. Okay, great.

Speaker-DThank you so much for clarifying. Okay, so Chair and members of the Commission, thank you so much for the opportunity to speak today.

My name is Annie, and I am speaking on behalf of Diana, who was our Um, and I am a part of a group of appellants to join HIA appeal concerning April 2nd, 2026 approvals for the Nine Mile Data Center and its related facilities, including one for the Wellstraw Natural Gas Plant, the solar facility, and the ReWater produced water operation. My statement is not about whether economic development is desirable or a doable business project. Rather, they can- whether these approvals comply with Duchenne County's General Plan, the A-5 Agricultural Zoning Framework, and Utah's Land Use Development and Management Act. Under Utah law, an administrative land use decision is presumed valid only if it is supported by substantial evidence, contains adequate written and documented findings, and is consistent with applicable land use applications and the General Plan. If any of those elements are missing, the decision is illegal and must be reversed automatically.

The Utah Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that findings must be detailed enough to permit meaningful review. In McKelvey v. City of Moab and